Vermont Budget Vetoed in Record-Breaking Vote

As a starting point, it is understandable that Governor Phil Scott of Vermont would reject an $8.3 billion budget proposal that included a hike in property taxes to cover COVID-19 expenses. These are unprecedented times, and many municipalities and states are struggling to find the funds necessary to safely handle the pandemic. However, simply striking down the budget without offering any alternative solutions seems short-sighted and potentially harmful to the state’s citizens.

Nonetheless, Governor Scott’s veto of the budget demonstrates a long-term, fiscally responsible approach to governing. It would have been easy to pass a budget that simply raised taxes to cover the immediate costs of the pandemic, but Scott appears to be taking a more nuanced and measured approach. By finding alternative means of funding for COVID-19 expenses, he is ensuring that Vermont’s economic recovery will be sustainable and not burdened by excessive taxation.

It is incumbent upon the state legislature to address this issue promptly and draft a revised budget. They must balance the need for additional spending to handle the pandemic while also ensuring that taxes do not become burdensome for the state’s citizens. It is a difficult tightrope to walk, but it is essential that they do so to ensure a safe and sustainable economic recovery for Vermont. Ultimately, this veto is a wake-up call for legislators to find creative solutions to fund these necessary expenses without placing an undue burden on taxpayers.


Here's A Video We Thought You Might Also Like:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *